Organizational author profile
ReadAstrology Editorial & Calculation Team
This team maintains public calculation documentation, evidence boundaries, source notes, responsible-use language, and editorial review.
Responsible owner: ReadAstrology Editorial & Calculation Team
Reviewed: 2026-07-18
Core commitments
- Calculation documentation
- Source and disclosure review
- Corrections accountability
Calculation documentation and editorial review — Maintains public methodology, evidence boundaries, source notes, responsible-use language, AI disclosure, and corrections review.
These pages describe current product and editorial practices. They are operational disclosures, not legal advice, certification, or a guarantee that every provider or feature will remain unchanged.
Team responsibility
The team reviews public astrology guides for calculation consistency, terminology, source quality, privacy boundaries, internal links, and clear separation between measured data and traditional interpretation.
Its byline represents a documented editorial process rather than a claim that every contributor holds the same personal background or credential.
Review scope
Reviews cover Western, Vedic, Chinese, numerology, and multi-system content. Technical checks use the product implementation, primary documentation, official calendar references, and visible evidence contracts.
The team also checks that AI-assisted language does not silently change the underlying calculation or make symbolic claims sound certain.
Accountability
Readers can report calculation, source, accessibility, privacy, or editorial issues through the contact and corrections pages.
Material changes update the reviewed date and regenerate the site's SEO, structured-data, sitemap, and internal-link verification gates.
Frequently asked questions
Is the team a professional licensing body?
No. It is the internal ReadAstrology editorial and calculation documentation team, not a licensing, medical, scientific, or professional certification organization.
How can I challenge a team-reviewed statement?
Use the corrections process and include the exact page, statement, source, and reason the calculation or explanation may be incorrect.